<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Parolski.com &#187; dtrace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parolski.com/tag/dtrace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parolski.com</link>
	<description>Faith, Solaris, and Chicken Korma, by Anton Parol</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:16:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>zfs in linux, maybe! (read only)</title>
		<link>http://www.parolski.com/2008/07/23/zfs-in-linux-maybe-read-only/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parolski.com/2008/07/23/zfs-in-linux-maybe-read-only/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anton Parol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtrace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zfs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parolski.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so Linux doesn&#8217;t have ZFS yet, but it might not be that far off. There are signs of a readonly implementation, depending on whether or not people actually understand the license, being considered by linux kernel hackers. This would be a huge boost for linux, and Solaris alike. As Darren Moffat points out, ZFS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so Linux doesn&#8217;t have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS">ZFS</a> yet, but it might not be that far off. There <a href="http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Proposing_Read-Only_ZFS">are signs of a readonly</a> implementation, depending on whether or not people actually understand the license, being considered by linux kernel hackers. This would be a huge boost for linux, and Solaris alike. As <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/zfs_under_gplv2_already_exists">Darren Moffat points out</a>, ZFS already exists in the FreeBSD source tree, and its likely to be in Mac OSX . Given this, surely its only a matter of time before we see it put in. Already <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/casablanca">we&#8217;ve seen Linus have talks with Jeff Bonwick</a>, which is definitely a good sign.</p>
<p>Maybe once this is done, a proper attempt at getting dtrace across might happen. After all, something like dtrace <a href="https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-2008-discuss/2008-June/000153.html">is</a> <a href="http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2007/05/15/why-linux-people-lust-after-dtrace/">highly desirable</a> on any operating system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parolski.com/2008/07/23/zfs-in-linux-maybe-read-only/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

