Posts tagged ‘Sun Microsystems’

Future could be brighter for Sun as it merges with Oracle

It has been announced today that approval has finally been given for Oracle to merge with Sun Microsystems. The process began in September 2009 which means that its been long enough for plenty of rumours to go around about whats going to happen both internally with head count cuts, and of course with the product line itself. Most importantly, the people with power to make decisions in these two structures now actually have the opportunity to go ahead and make those decisions.

If Larry is true to his word about what he sees for the future of the Sun product line, I for one would certainly say that the future is going to be fairly bright.

Mr Ellisons (CEO of Oracle) own words:

“We are keeping everything. We are keeping tape, we are keeping storage, we are keeping x86 technology, we’re keeping SPARC technology, we’re going to increase the investment in it…”

“…we are NOT going to spin anything off.”

The discussions about improving data center power consumption efficiency and increasing demand for online services place the T-series equipment very well for those who know just how good they are. Coupled with the fact that Sun had famously invested early in the R+D for this kind of technology, theres also a great opportunity to get OpenSolaris beefed up in terms of packages and installers, and deployed in these environments.

I’m looking forward to seeing how its all going to pan out!

288GB of RAM in an Intel box?Soon you say?

Ok, so people who know me, will know that I think RAM is pretty cool stuff, and that you cant really have enough. OK, so you can have enough, but it is very handy stuff.

A register article today was talking about how MetaRAM can now get 288GB of RAM in a single machine. As someone quickly pointed out in the comments, Sun Microsystems have a machine out for almost 2 years now which supports 256GB of RAM. Its an x86 machine called the x4600. Sun also sell a SPARC machine called the M9000. It supports 2TB of RAM. Thats 2000GB of RAM. Oh, and its got 64 processors.

People should really not be surprised that the limit of how much RAM they have, is not to do with their choice of hardware, but rather choice of Operating System. At this time of writing, thew most advanced version of Windows Server 2003 (Datacenter Edition) CAN address up to 2TB of RAM. But because its written for the x86 architecture, you’ll struggle to run it anywhere to address it all. I should imagine that its partly to do with market demand; you can be sure that if customers were crying out for high capacity x86 equipment, the manufacturers would be making it. Maybe Microsoft should make a port of Windows to run on SPARC? ;)

I find that on the whole this is quite typical of Sun. Their hardware can cost more, but it comes out earlier, and its better than kit in the same class. Sort of like Volkswagen or BMW. Higher cost, but higher quality, and more innovation.