<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Parolski.com &#187; x86</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parolski.com/tag/x86/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parolski.com</link>
	<description>Faith, Solaris, and Chicken Korma, by Anton Parol</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:34:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>288GB of RAM in an Intel box?Soon you say?</title>
		<link>http://www.parolski.com/2008/08/23/288gb-of-ram-in-an-intel-boxsoon-you-say/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parolski.com/2008/08/23/288gb-of-ram-in-an-intel-boxsoon-you-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anton Parol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M9000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x4600]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x86]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parolski.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so people who know me, will know that I think RAM is pretty cool stuff, and that you cant really have enough. OK, so you can have enough, but it is very handy stuff. A register article today was talking about how MetaRAM can now get 288GB of RAM in a single machine. As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so people who know me, will know that I think RAM is pretty cool stuff, and that you cant really have enough. OK, so you can have enough, but it is very handy stuff.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/22/metaram_16gb/comments/">register article</a> today was talking about how MetaRAM can now get 288GB of RAM in a single machine. As someone quickly pointed out in the comments, Sun Microsystems have a machine out for almost 2 years now which supports 256GB of RAM. Its an x86 machine called the<a href="http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4600/"> x4600</a>. Sun also sell a SPARC machine called the <a href="http://www.sun.com/servers/highend/m9000/">M9000</a>. It supports 2TB of RAM. Thats 2000GB of RAM. Oh, and its got 64 processors.</p>
<p>People should really not be surprised that the limit of how much RAM they have, is not to do with their choice of hardware, but rather choice of Operating System. At this time of writing, thew most advanced version of Windows Server 2003 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Server_2003#Datacenter_Edition">(Datacenter Edition)</a> CAN address up to 2TB of RAM. But because its written for the x86 architecture, you&#8217;ll struggle to run it anywhere to address it all. I should imagine that its partly to do with market demand; you can be sure that if customers were crying out for high capacity x86 equipment, the manufacturers would be making it. Maybe Microsoft should make a port of Windows to run on SPARC? <img src='http://www.parolski.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I find that on the whole this is quite typical of Sun. Their hardware can cost more, but it comes out earlier, and its better than kit in the same class. Sort of like Volkswagen or BMW. Higher cost, but higher quality, and more innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parolski.com/2008/08/23/288gb-of-ram-in-an-intel-boxsoon-you-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
